Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other sufficient remedy is provided by law." It truly is effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, It is usually a properly-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings to the evidence.
limitation of liability to the extent of the cap provided through the registered mortgage deed(Banking Law)
Deterrence: The dread of severe outcomes, together with capital punishment, is meant to discourage prospective criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is vital in reducing the occurrence of intentional killings.
“Guaranteeing the accuracy of legal information is paramount,” says Barrister Ayesha Khan, a leading legal expert in Lahore. “Cross-referencing information from multiple trustworthy sources is essential for reliable legal research.”
The different roles of case legislation in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in the way in which that courts render decisions. Common regulation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale driving their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and infrequently interpret the wider legal principles.
The ruling with the first court created case regulation that must be followed by other courts until finally or Except if possibly new regulation is created, or maybe a higher court rules differently.
Upholding Justice: The application from the regulation along with the subsequent punishment with the guilty party provide a feeling of closure business law case studies ppt and justice to your sufferer’s family and loved kinds.
This system, to be used by members in the Virginia State Bar and their designated staff, allows electronic filing of most civil cases in circuit court.
This case continues to be cited in quite a few subsequent judgments, particularly in cases involving constitutional legislation, judicial independence, as well as the rule of legislation.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
In order to prove murder, there must be an intention to cause the death of that person along with the action of actually injuring them – and that injury subsequently leading to and causing the death of that person.
13309-B of 2010 being weak types of evidence plus the evidentiary value whereof would be noticed with the time from the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Consequently, confirmed custody of the petitioner in jail is not going to provide any valuable purpose at this stage.”
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to determine a commission of internationally known and acknowledged scientists to review and rule on future grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power strains.